Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and AI at Meta. Claude 3.5 Haiku ships a 200k-token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct costs $0.24/1M input tokens versus $0.8/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is ~233% cheaper at $0.24/1M; pay for Claude 3.5 Haiku only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2026-01-01 |
| Context window | 200k | — |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Unknown | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.8/1M tokens | $0.24/1M tokens |
| Output price | $4/1M tokens | $0.97/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude 3.5 Haiku, multimodal input: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct, reasoning mode: Claude 3.5 Haiku, and code execution: Claude 3.5 Haiku. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude 3.5 Haiku lists $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct lists $0.24/1M input and $0.97/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct lower by about $1.3 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct costs $0.24/1M input and $0.97/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct open source?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is listed under Unknown. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude 3.5 Haiku has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude 3.5 Haiku has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available on Anthropic, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, and Replicate API. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.