Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok-2
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024) and Grok-2 (2024) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and xAI. Claude 3.5 Sonnet ships a 200k-token context window, while Grok-2 ships a 128k-token context window. On HumanEval, Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads by 3.6 pts. On pricing, Grok-2 costs $0.50/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Grok-2 is ~500% cheaper at $0.50/1M; pay for Claude 3.5 Sonnet only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Grok-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $0.50/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | HumanEval leader | 3 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds a shared-benchmark lead on HumanEval, ahead by 3.6 points.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude 3.5 Sonnet for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Grok-2 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.50/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Grok-2 for Coding, RAG, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: GCP Vertex AI
Grok-2
$525
Cheapest tracked route/tier: SiliconFlow
Estimated monthly gap: $5,625. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-2; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Grok-2 is $14.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok-2 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $14.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-08-01 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Parameters | 70B | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Grok License |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Grok-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $0.50/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $0.50/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Grok-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Grok-2 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 92.0 | 88.4 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1340.0 | 1255.0 |
| Massive Multitask Language Understanding | 88.7 | 87.5 |
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Popular comparisons for Grok-2
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.