Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro ships a 1m-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 9.5 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Gemini 2.5 Pro fits 5x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Claude Haiku 4.5 for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 1m |
| Cheapest output | $4/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 9 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 1 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Haiku 4.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 9.5 points.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio <=200K tokens
Estimated monthly gap: $1,860. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro adds Reasoning in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 is $6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2025-06-17 |
| Context window | 200k | 1m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-02 | 2025-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.80/1M tokens |
|
| Output price | $4/1M tokens |
|
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3 | 63.8 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Haiku 4.5 at 73.3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at 63.8, with Claude Haiku 4.5 ahead by 9.5 points. The largest visible gap is 9.5 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Gemini 2.5 Pro. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Haiku 4.5 lists $0.80/1M input and $4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Gemini 2.5 Pro lists tiered pricing: <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Claude Haiku 4.5 lower by about $2.12 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 9 providers versus 4, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1m tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 lists $0.80/1M input and $4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Gemini 2.5 Pro lists tiered pricing: <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro open source?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Pro is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Snowflake Cortex, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o3
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Popular comparisons for Claude Haiku 4.5
Popular comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Pro
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.