DeepSeek V3 vs Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
DeepSeek V3 (2024) and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B (2026) are compact production models from DeepSeek and Google DeepMind. DeepSeek V3 ships a 64k-token context window, while Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B ships a 8k-token context window. On pricing, Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B costs $0.02/1M input tokens versus $0.10/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is ~400% cheaper at $0.02/1M; pay for DeepSeek V3 only for long-context analysis.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | DeepSeek V3 | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | tool-calling agents and provider-routed production | tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, Agents, and Classification | Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | 64k | 8k |
| Cheapest output | $0.30/1M tokens | $0.04/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 13 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- DeepSeek V3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- DeepSeek V3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags DeepSeek V3 for Coding, Agents, and Classification.
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.04/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B for Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
DeepSeek V3
$155
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Bitdeer AI
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
$26.00
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Together AI
Estimated monthly gap: $129. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Together AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is $0.26/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Provider overlap exists on Together AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- DeepSeek V3 is $0.26/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2026-03-15 |
| Context window | 64k | 8k |
| Parameters | 671B | 4B |
| Architecture | Mixture of Experts | Decoder Only |
| License | MITOSI-approved | Gemma |
| Openness | Open source | Open weights |
| Weights | Available | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | 2024-06 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | DeepSeek V3 | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.10/1M tokens | $0.02/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.30/1M tokens | $0.04/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek V3 | Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for DeepSeek V3
Popular comparisons for Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Granite Guardian 3.0 8B
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.