LLM Reference

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API (2025) and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (2024) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and AI at Meta. Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API ships a 128k-token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API is ~380% cheaper at $0.50/1M; pay for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct only for provider fit.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemini 2.5 Flash Live APILlama 3.1 405B Instruct
Best formultimodal apps and tool-calling agentsprovider-routed production
Decision fitRAG, Agents, and Long contextRAG, Long context, and Classification
Context window128k128k
Cheapest output$2/1M tokens$2.40/1M tokens
Provider routes1 tracked11 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API when...
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2/1M tokens.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct when...
  • Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Llama 3.1 405B Instruct uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 405B Instruct for RAG, Long context, and Classification.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API

$900

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

$2,520

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Estimated monthly gap: $1,620. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API -> Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $0.40/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling before moving production traffic.
  • Llama 3.1 405B Instruct adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct -> Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API is $0.40/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API adds Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-12-012024-07-23
Context window128k128k
Parameters405B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryLlama 3 Community
OpennessProprietaryOpen weights
Commercial useCommercial use with conditionsCommercial use with conditions
Knowledge cutoff2025-012023-12

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemini 2.5 Flash Live APILlama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input price$0.50/1M tokens$2.40/1M tokens
Output price$2/1M tokens$2.40/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 2.5 Flash Live APILlama 3.1 405B Instruct
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API, multimodal input: Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API, function calling: Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API, tool use: Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API, and structured outputs: Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API lists $0.50/1M input and $2/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct lists $2.40/1M input and $2.40/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API lower by about $1.45 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 11, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API when vision-heavy evaluation and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API supports 128k tokens, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API costs $0.50/1M input and $2/1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct costs $2.40/1M input and $2.40/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct open source?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API is listed under Proprietary. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API is available on Google AI Studio. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on OctoAI API (Deprecated), Together AI, Fireworks AI, IBM watsonx, and Scale AI GenAI Platform. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.