Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Qwen3-105B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools (2026) and Qwen3-105B (2025) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and Alibaba. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools ships a 1m-token context window, while Qwen3-105B ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Qwen3-105B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Qwen3-105B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and long-context analysis | tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | RAG, Long context, and Vision | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
- Qwen3-105B uniquely exposes Function calling and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3-105B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Qwen3-105B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Qwen3-105B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Qwen3-105B adds Function calling and Tool use in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen3-105B and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-01-01 | 2025-12-15 |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 105B |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0(OSI) |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use allowed |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2025-02 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Qwen3-105B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $12/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Qwen3-105B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, multimodal input: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, function calling: Qwen3-105B, tool use: Qwen3-105B, and structured outputs: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has $2/1M input tokens and Qwen3-105B has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3-105B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Qwen3-105B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports 1m tokens, while Qwen3-105B supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Qwen3-105B open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is listed under Proprietary. Qwen3-105B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Qwen3-105B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Qwen3-105B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or Qwen3-105B?
Qwen3-105B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Qwen3-105B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is available on OpenRouter. Qwen3-105B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-04. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.