LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

GLM-5 9B vs Mixtral 8x22B v0.1

GLM-5 9B (2026) and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 (2024) are frontier reasoning models from Zhipu AI and MistralAI. GLM-5 9B ships a 262K-token context window, while Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 ships a 64K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

GLM-5 9B fits 4x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 for tighter calls.

Specs

Released2026-02-152024-04-17
Context window262K64K
Parameters98x22B
Architecturedecoder onlymixture of experts
LicenseOpen SourceApache 2.0
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

GLM-5 9BMixtral 8x22B v0.1
Input price-$0.3/1M tokens
Output price-$0.9/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

GLM-5 9BMixtral 8x22B v0.1
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: GLM-5 9B, function calling: GLM-5 9B, and tool use: GLM-5 9B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: GLM-5 9B has no token price sourced yet and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 has $0.3/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 8. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose GLM-5 9B when reasoning depth and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5 9B or Mixtral 8x22B v0.1?

GLM-5 9B supports 262K tokens, while Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 supports 64K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is GLM-5 9B or Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 open source?

GLM-5 9B is listed under Open Source. Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, GLM-5 9B or Mixtral 8x22B v0.1?

GLM-5 9B has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, GLM-5 9B or Mixtral 8x22B v0.1?

GLM-5 9B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for tool use, GLM-5 9B or Mixtral 8x22B v0.1?

GLM-5 9B has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run GLM-5 9B and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1?

GLM-5 9B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 is available on NVIDIA NIM, OctoAI API, Fireworks AI, DeepInfra, and Baseten API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.