LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Grok 3 Mini vs Llama Guard 3 1B

Grok 3 Mini (2025) and Llama Guard 3 1B (2024) are general-purpose language models from xAI and AI at Meta. Grok 3 Mini ships a 131k-token context window, while Llama Guard 3 1B ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Llama Guard 3 1B costs $0.1/1M input tokens versus $0.3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Llama Guard 3 1B is ~200% cheaper at $0.1/1M; pay for Grok 3 Mini only for provider fit.

Specs

Released2025-02-172024-09-25
Context window131k
Parameters1B
Architecture-decoder only
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Grok 3 MiniLlama Guard 3 1B
Input price$0.3/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Output price$0.5/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Grok 3 MiniLlama Guard 3 1B
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Grok 3 Mini and structured outputs: Grok 3 Mini. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Grok 3 Mini lists $0.3/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens, while Llama Guard 3 1B lists $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama Guard 3 1B lower by about $0.26 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Grok 3 Mini when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Llama Guard 3 1B when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 Mini or Llama Guard 3 1B?

Llama Guard 3 1B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Grok 3 Mini costs $0.3/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 3 1B costs $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Grok 3 Mini or Llama Guard 3 1B open source?

Grok 3 Mini is listed under Proprietary. Llama Guard 3 1B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for multimodal input, Grok 3 Mini or Llama Guard 3 1B?

Grok 3 Mini has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Grok 3 Mini or Llama Guard 3 1B?

Grok 3 Mini has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Grok 3 Mini and Llama Guard 3 1B?

Grok 3 Mini is available on OpenRouter. Llama Guard 3 1B is available on Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

When should I pick Grok 3 Mini over Llama Guard 3 1B?

Llama Guard 3 1B is ~200% cheaper at $0.1/1M; pay for Grok 3 Mini only for provider fit. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Grok 3 Mini; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Llama Guard 3 1B.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.