LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct

Grok Code Fast 1 (2025) and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct (2024) are agentic coding models from xAI and Microsoft Research. Grok Code Fast 1 ships a 262K-token context window, while Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. On pricing, Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input tokens versus $0.5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Grok Code Fast 1 is ~150% cheaper at $0.2/1M; pay for Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct only for provider fit.

Specs

Released2025-08-272024-08-20
Context window262K128K
Parameters314B16x3.8B (42B, 6.6B active)
Architecturemixture of expertsdecoder only
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Grok Code Fast 1Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct
Input price$0.2/1M tokens$0.5/1M tokens
Output price$1.5/1M tokens$0.5/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Grok Code Fast 1Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Grok Code Fast 1, tool use: Grok Code Fast 1, and structured outputs: Grok Code Fast 1. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Grok Code Fast 1 lists $0.2/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens, while Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct lists $0.5/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct lower by about $0.09 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Grok Code Fast 1 or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 supports 262K tokens, while Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct costs $0.5/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Grok Code Fast 1 or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct open source?

Grok Code Fast 1 is listed under Proprietary. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for function calling, Grok Code Fast 1 or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for tool use, Grok Code Fast 1 or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Grok Code Fast 1 and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 is available on OpenRouter. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct is available on Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.