LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Llama Guard 2 8B vs Llama Guard 3 1B

Llama Guard 2 8B (2024) and Llama Guard 3 1B (2024) are compact production models from AI at Meta. Llama Guard 2 8B ships a 8K-token context window, while Llama Guard 3 1B ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Llama Guard 2 8B costs $0.05/1M input tokens versus $0.1/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Llama Guard 2 8B is ~100% cheaper at $0.05/1M; pay for Llama Guard 3 1B only for provider fit.

Specs

Released2024-04-182024-09-25
Context window8K
Parameters8B1B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Llama Guard 2 8BLlama Guard 3 1B
Input price$0.05/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Output price$0.25/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Llama Guard 2 8BLlama Guard 3 1B
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint is close: both models cover the core production surface. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

For cost, Llama Guard 2 8B lists $0.05/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens, while Llama Guard 3 1B lists $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama Guard 3 1B lower by about $0.01 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Llama Guard 2 8B when provider fit, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Llama Guard 3 1B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 2 8B or Llama Guard 3 1B?

Llama Guard 2 8B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama Guard 2 8B costs $0.05/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 3 1B costs $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Llama Guard 2 8B or Llama Guard 3 1B open source?

Llama Guard 2 8B is listed under Open Source. Llama Guard 3 1B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Where can I run Llama Guard 2 8B and Llama Guard 3 1B?

Llama Guard 2 8B is available on Fireworks AI, OctoAI API, and Replicate API. Llama Guard 3 1B is available on Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Llama Guard 2 8B over Llama Guard 3 1B?

Llama Guard 2 8B is ~100% cheaper at $0.05/1M; pay for Llama Guard 3 1B only for provider fit. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Llama Guard 2 8B; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Llama Guard 3 1B.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.