Llama Guard 4 12B vs Llama Guard 7B
Llama Guard 4 12B (2025) and Llama Guard 7B (2023) are compact production models from AI at Meta. Llama Guard 4 12B ships a 164K-token context window, while Llama Guard 7B ships a 2K-token context window. On pricing, Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18/1M input tokens versus $0.2/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Llama Guard 4 12B fits 82x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama Guard 7B for tighter calls.
Specs
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2023-12-07 |
| Context window | 164K | 2K |
| Parameters | — | 7B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Llama Guard 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.18/1M tokens | $0.2/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.18/1M tokens | $0.2/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Llama Guard 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint is close: both models cover structured outputs. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Llama Guard 4 12B lists $0.18/1M input and $0.18/1M output tokens, while Llama Guard 7B lists $0.2/1M input and $0.2/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama Guard 4 12B lower by about $0.02 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Llama Guard 7B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Llama Guard 4 12B or Llama Guard 7B?
Llama Guard 4 12B supports 164K tokens, while Llama Guard 7B supports 2K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Llama Guard 7B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18/1M input and $0.18/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 7B costs $0.2/1M input and $0.2/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B or Llama Guard 7B open source?
Llama Guard 4 12B is listed under Open Source. Llama Guard 7B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for structured outputs, Llama Guard 4 12B or Llama Guard 7B?
Both Llama Guard 4 12B and Llama Guard 7B expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Llama Guard 4 12B and Llama Guard 7B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is available on NVIDIA NIM, Replicate API, and OpenRouter. Llama Guard 7B is available on Cloudflare Workers AI, Together AI, and Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Llama Guard 4 12B over Llama Guard 7B?
Llama Guard 4 12B fits 82x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama Guard 7B for tighter calls. If your workload also depends on long-context analysis, start with Llama Guard 4 12B; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Llama Guard 7B.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.