LLM Reference

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Instruct

Llama 3 70B Instruct (2024) and Llama 3 8B Instruct (2024) are compact production models from AI at Meta. Llama 3 70B Instruct ships a 8k-token context window, while Llama 3 8B Instruct ships a 8k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Llama 3 70B Instruct leads by 16.9 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Llama 3 8B Instruct is ~1233% cheaper at $0.03/1M; pay for Llama 3 70B Instruct only for provider fit.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalLlama 3 70B InstructLlama 3 8B Instruct
Best forprovider-routed productionprovider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, Classification, and JSON / Tool useCoding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use
Context window8k8k
Cheapest output$0.40/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Provider routes18 tracked17 tracked
Shared benchmarksMMLU PRO leader4 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Llama 3 70B Instruct when...
  • Llama 3 70B Instruct holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 16.9 points.
  • Llama 3 70B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3 70B Instruct for Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
Choose Llama 3 8B Instruct when...
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.04/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3 8B Instruct for Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Llama 3 8B Instruct

Llama 3 70B Instruct

$420

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Hyperbolic AI Inference

Llama 3 8B Instruct

$34.00

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $386. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Llama 3 70B Instruct -> Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock, DeepInfra, and OctoAI API (Deprecated); start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct is $0.36/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
Llama 3 8B Instruct -> Llama 3 70B Instruct
  • Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, and Microsoft Foundry; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Llama 3 70B Instruct is $0.36/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-04-182024-04-18
Context window8k8k
Parameters70B8B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseLlama 3 CommunityLlama 3 Community
OpennessOpen weightsOpen weights
Commercial useCommercial use with conditionsCommercial use with conditions
Knowledge cutoff2023-122023-03

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeLlama 3 70B InstructLlama 3 8B Instruct
Input price$0.40/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output price$0.40/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama 3 70B InstructLlama 3 8B Instruct
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkLlama 3 70B InstructLlama 3 8B Instruct
MMLU PRO57.440.5
HumanEval72.668.2
Instruction-Following Evaluation77.859.5
Massive Multitask Language Understanding82.076.9

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Llama 3 70B Instruct at 57.4 and Llama 3 8B Instruct at 40.5, with Llama 3 70B Instruct ahead by 16.9 points; HumanEval has Llama 3 70B Instruct at 72.6 and Llama 3 8B Instruct at 68.2, with Llama 3 70B Instruct ahead by 4.4 points; Instruction-Following Evaluation has Llama 3 70B Instruct at 77.8 and Llama 3 8B Instruct at 59.5, with Llama 3 70B Instruct ahead by 18.3 points. The largest visible gap is 18.3 points on Instruction-Following Evaluation, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint is close: both models cover structured outputs. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

For cost, Llama 3 70B Instruct lists $0.40/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 3 8B Instruct lists $0.03/1M input and $0.04/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 3 8B Instruct lower by about $0.37 per million blended tokens. Availability is 18 providers versus 17, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Llama 3 70B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3 8B Instruct when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Llama 3 8B Instruct?

Llama 3 70B Instruct supports 8k tokens, while Llama 3 8B Instruct supports 8k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Llama 3 8B Instruct?

Llama 3 8B Instruct is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama 3 70B Instruct costs $0.40/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens. Llama 3 8B Instruct costs $0.03/1M input and $0.04/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Llama 3 70B Instruct or Llama 3 8B Instruct open source?

Llama 3 70B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. Llama 3 8B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for structured outputs, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Llama 3 8B Instruct?

Both Llama 3 70B Instruct and Llama 3 8B Instruct expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Llama 3 70B Instruct and Llama 3 8B Instruct?

Llama 3 70B Instruct is available on GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, NVIDIA NIM, and DeepInfra. Llama 3 8B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock, DeepInfra, OctoAI API (Deprecated), Fireworks AI, and Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Llama 3 70B Instruct over Llama 3 8B Instruct?

Llama 3 8B Instruct is ~1233% cheaper at $0.03/1M; pay for Llama 3 70B Instruct only for provider fit. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Llama 3 70B Instruct; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Llama 3 8B Instruct.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.