LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Llama 3 70B Instruct (2024) and Step 3.5 Flash (2026) are frontier reasoning models from AI at Meta and StepFun. Llama 3 70B Instruct ships a 8K-token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash ships a 256K-token context window. On pricing, Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.1/1M input tokens versus $0.4/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Step 3.5 Flash is ~300% cheaper at $0.1/1M; pay for Llama 3 70B Instruct only for provider fit.

Specs

Released2024-04-182026-01-29
Context window8K256K
Parameters70B196B (11B active)
Architecturedecoder onlymixture of experts
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Llama 3 70B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
Input price$0.4/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Output price$0.4/1M tokens$0.3/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Llama 3 70B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Step 3.5 Flash and structured outputs: Llama 3 70B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Llama 3 70B Instruct lists $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens, while Step 3.5 Flash lists $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Step 3.5 Flash lower by about $0.24 per million blended tokens. Availability is 18 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Llama 3 70B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Step 3.5 Flash when reasoning depth, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash supports 256K tokens, while Llama 3 70B Instruct supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama 3 70B Instruct costs $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens. Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Llama 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash open source?

Llama 3 70B Instruct is listed under Open Source. Step 3.5 Flash is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Llama 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Llama 3 70B Instruct has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Llama 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash?

Llama 3 70B Instruct is available on GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, NVIDIA NIM, and DeepInfra. Step 3.5 Flash is available on OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.