Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 4 340B
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) and Nemotron 4 340B (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1.05m-token context window, while Nemotron 4 340B ships a 4k-token context window. On pricing, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/1M input tokens versus $4.20/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coding-specialized model, while Nemotron 4 340B is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Classification and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | 1.05m | 4k |
| Cheapest output | $0.87/1M tokens | $4.20/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.87/1M tokens.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro uniquely exposes Function calling and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags Nemotron 4 340B for Classification and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$566
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Nemotron 4 340B
$4,410
Cheapest tracked route/tier: DeepInfra
Estimated monthly gap: $3,845. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 4 340B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Nemotron 4 340B is $3.33/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nemotron 4 340B and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $3.33/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro adds Function calling and Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2025-02-27 |
| Context window | 1.05m | 4k |
| Parameters | 1T | 340B |
| Architecture | mixture of experts | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | NVIDIA Open Model |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use allowed |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.43/1M tokens | $4.20/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.87/1M tokens | $4.20/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and tool use: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Nemotron 4 340B lists $4.20/1M input and $4.20/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro lower by about $3.63 per million blended tokens. Availability is 3 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Nemotron 4 340B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.05m tokens, while Nemotron 4 340B supports 4k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/1M input and $0.87/1M output tokens. Nemotron 4 340B costs $4.20/1M input and $4.20/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340B open source?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is listed under Proprietary. Nemotron 4 340B is listed under NVIDIA Open Model. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for function calling, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 4 340B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available on OpenRouter, Xiaomi, and Novita AI. Nemotron 4 340B is available on NVIDIA NIM and DeepInfra. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.