Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi-4 14B
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (2026) and Phi-4 14B (2024) are agentic coding models from Xiaomi and Microsoft Research. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships a 1M-token context window, while Phi-4 14B ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Phi-4 14B costs $0.07/1M input tokens versus $1/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Phi-4 14B is ~1438% cheaper at $0.07/1M; pay for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-12-13 |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Parameters | 1T | 14B |
| Architecture | mixture of experts | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Open Source |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1/1M tokens | $0.07/1M tokens |
| Output price | $3/1M tokens | $0.14/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and tool use: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists $1/1M input and $3/1M output tokens, while Phi-4 14B lists $0.07/1M input and $0.14/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Phi-4 14B lower by about $1.51 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Phi-4 14B when provider fit, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 14B?
Phi-4 14B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $1/1M input and $3/1M output tokens. Phi-4 14B costs $0.07/1M input and $0.14/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 14B open source?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is listed under Proprietary. Phi-4 14B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for function calling, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 14B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 14B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for structured outputs, Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 14B?
Both Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi-4 14B expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi-4 14B?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available on OpenRouter. Phi-4 14B is available on OpenRouter and Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.