LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Mixtral 8x7B vs Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct

Mixtral 8x7B (2023) and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct (2024) are compact production models from MistralAI and Microsoft Research. Mixtral 8x7B ships a 32K-token context window, while Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. On pricing, Mixtral 8x7B costs $0.15/1M input tokens versus $0.5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Mixtral 8x7B is ~233% cheaper at $0.15/1M; pay for Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct only for long-context analysis.

Specs

Released2023-12-112024-08-20
Context window32K128K
Parameters8x7B16x3.8B (42B, 6.6B active)
Architecturemixture of expertsdecoder only
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Knowledge cutoff2023-12-

Pricing and availability

Mixtral 8x7BPhi 3.5 MoE Instruct
Input price$0.15/1M tokens$0.5/1M tokens
Output price$0.45/1M tokens$0.5/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Mixtral 8x7BPhi 3.5 MoE Instruct
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint is close: both models cover the core production surface. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

For cost, Mixtral 8x7B lists $0.15/1M input and $0.45/1M output tokens, while Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct lists $0.5/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Mixtral 8x7B lower by about $0.26 per million blended tokens. Availability is 18 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Mixtral 8x7B when provider fit, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Mixtral 8x7B or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct supports 128K tokens, while Mixtral 8x7B supports 32K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x7B or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Mixtral 8x7B costs $0.15/1M input and $0.45/1M output tokens. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct costs $0.5/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Mixtral 8x7B or Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct open source?

Mixtral 8x7B is listed under Apache 2.0. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Where can I run Mixtral 8x7B and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Mixtral 8x7B is available on Databricks Foundation Model Serving, NVIDIA NIM, GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, and OctoAI API. Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct is available on Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Mixtral 8x7B over Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct?

Mixtral 8x7B is ~233% cheaper at $0.15/1M; pay for Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct only for long-context analysis. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Mixtral 8x7B; if it depends on long-context analysis, run the same evaluation with Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.