LLM Reference

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024) and Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and AI at Meta. Claude 3.5 Haiku ships a 200k-token context window, while Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct ships a 10m-token context window. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct costs $0.08/1M input tokens versus $0.80/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is ~900% cheaper at $0.08/1M; pay for Claude 3.5 Haiku only for coding workflow support.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and provider-routed productionmultimodal apps, long-context analysis, and provider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window200k10m
Cheapest output$4/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Provider routes6 tracked12 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when...
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku uniquely exposes Reasoning and Code execution in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Claude 3.5 Haiku for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct when...
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.30/1M tokens.
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct uniquely exposes Multimodal in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct

Claude 3.5 Haiku

$1,640

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic

Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct

$139

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $1,501. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Claude 3.5 Haiku -> Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, GCP Vertex AI, and AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is $3.70/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Code execution before moving production traffic.
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct adds Multimodal in local capability data.
Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct -> Claude 3.5 Haiku
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku is $3.70/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Multimodal before moving production traffic.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku adds Reasoning and Code execution in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-10-222025-04-05
Context window200k10m
Parameters—109B (17B active)
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyMixture of Experts
LicenseProprietaryLlama 4 Community
OpennessProprietaryOpen weights
WeightsNot releasedUnknown
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: conditional
Knowledge cutoff-2024-08

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
Input price$0.80/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
VisionYesYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
JSON / Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.