Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4 Turbo
Claude Opus 4.5 (2025) and GPT-4 Turbo (2024) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while GPT-4 Turbo ships a 128k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Claude Opus 4.5 leads by 19.5 pts. On pricing, both list $5/1M input tokens on the cheapest tracked route. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 for general evaluation; GPT-4 Turbo is better when coding workflow support matters more.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 6 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 2 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 19.5 points.
- Claude Opus 4.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Opus 4.5 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GPT-4 Turbo has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $15/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4 Turbo for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.5
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Microsoft Foundry
GPT-4 Turbo
$7,750
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Replicate API
Estimated monthly gap: $2,500. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GPT-4 Turbo is $10/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.5 is $10/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.5 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-11-01 | 2024-04-09 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | 2023-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $5/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 88.9 | 69.4 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1466.0 | 1242.0 |
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude Opus 4.5
Popular comparisons for GPT-4 Turbo
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.