Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 (2026) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude Opus 4.7 ships a 1m-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro ships a 1m-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 23.8 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Claude Opus 4.7 is safer overall; choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 1m |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 5 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.7 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 23.8 points.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.7 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $10/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.7
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio <=200K tokens
Estimated monthly gap: $6,750. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is $15/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is $15/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-06-17 |
| Context window | 1m | 1m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01 | 2025-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens |
|
| Output price | $25/1M tokens |
|
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6 | 63.8 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 94.2 | 86.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 54.7 | 18.8 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1503.0 | 1398.0 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4 | 32.6 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Opus 4.7 at 87.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at 63.8, with Claude Opus 4.7 ahead by 23.8 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Claude Opus 4.7 at 94.2 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at 86.4, with Claude Opus 4.7 ahead by 7.8 points; Humanity's Last Exam has Claude Opus 4.7 at 54.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro at 18.8, with Claude Opus 4.7 ahead by 35.9 points. The largest visible gap is 35.9 points on Humanity's Last Exam, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.7 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Gemini 2.5 Pro lists tiered pricing: <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 2.5 Pro lower by about $7.13 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 6 providers versus 4, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when coding workflow support and lower cheapest-tier input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1m tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1m tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Gemini 2.5 Pro lists tiered pricing: <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; <=200K tokens is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output; >200K tokens is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $15/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro open source?
Claude Opus 4.7 is listed under Proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Pro is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 is available on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-05. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.