LLM Reference

Claude Opus 4.7

Released
2026-04-16
Last refreshed
2026-07-26
Status
Researched 62d ago
ProprietaryCommercial use: conditionalMultimodalCodingRAGAgentsLong contextVisionJSON / Tool useHighlight

Claude Opus 4.7 is worth evaluating for coding, rag, and agents when its provider route and context window match the workload.

Use it for

  • Teams evaluating coding, rag, and agents
  • Workloads that can use a 1m context window
  • Buyers comparing 4 tracked provider routes

Do not use it for

  • Workloads where another current model has stronger sourced task evidence
Specifications
Released
2026-04-16
Context
1m
Max output
128,000
Architecture
Decoder Only
Knowledge cutoff
2026-01
Specialization
general
Openness
Proprietary
License
ProprietaryCommercial use: conditional
Weights
Not released
Code
Unknown
Training
Fine-tuned
Created by
AnthropicAnthropic

Developing safe and ethical AI systems.

San Francisco, California, United States
Founded 2021
Website
Pricing
Output / 1M
$25.00
Input / 1M
$5.00

Cheapest of 6 routes · Anthropic · cache read $0.500

Providers(6)
AnthropicAWS BedrockGCP Vertex AIMicrosoft FoundryOpenRouterVercel AI Gateway
View 6 provider routes
Links
Website

About

Claude Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's generally available flagship model with 1M context, 128K max output, adaptive thinking, and a new tokenizer with roughly 555K words per 1M tokens.

Top use-case fit: coding, agents, and build tasks

Coding

Q/$ D

2 relevant benchmarks in the decision map.

RAG

Included by capability and metadata signals in the decision map.

Agents

Q/$ D

2 relevant benchmarks in the decision map.

Provider price ladder

Compare all 6

Compare API pricing across 4 providers for input and output tokens, batch, and cached reads when available.

ProviderInput / 1MOutput / 1MBatch in / outCacheRoute
Anthropic$5.00$25.00$2.50 / $12.50read $0.500 / 5m $6.25 / 1h $10.00
Serverless
AWS Bedrock$5.00$25.00--
Serverless
GCP Vertex AI$5.00$25.00--
Serverless
Microsoft Foundry$5.00$25.00-read $0.500 / 5m $6.25 / 1h $10.00
Serverless

Available via routers & gateways(16)

LiteLLM

Gateway

Open-source Python SDK and proxy server that unifies 100+ LLM APIs behind a single OpenAI-compatible interface, with load balancing, cost tracking, and configurable failover.

Free OSSAnthropicGCP Vertex AIMicrosoft Foundry

OpenRouter

Hybrid

Unified hybrid gateway to 400+ models from 60+ providers via a single OpenAI-compatible API, with optional auto-routing that selects the best model per prompt.

PassthroughAnthropicGCP Vertex AI

Portkey

Gateway

Production AI gateway routing to 1,600+ LLMs with failover, load balancing, semantic caching, and guardrails; Apache 2.0 core is fully self-hostable with the complete feature set.

SubscriptionAnthropicGCP Vertex AIMicrosoft Foundry

AIRouter

Router

Commercial LLM router that analyzes incoming requests and routes to the optimal model for cost/quality/latency via a drop-in OpenAI-compatible API, with a privacy-preserving embedding mode that avoids sending prompt content.

Passthrough + feeAnthropicGCP Vertex AI

Amazon Bedrock Intelligent Prompt Routing

Router

AWS Bedrock's native intelligent prompt router that routes prompts between Anthropic Claude model tiers (Haiku/Sonnet) based on predicted task complexity, with no extra per-routing charge.

PassthroughAWS Bedrock

Azure AI Foundry Model Router

Router

Microsoft Azure AI Foundry's native model router that uses a trained ML model to route each prompt in real time to the optimal Azure-hosted model, with Balanced/Cost/Quality mode selection and automatic failover.

PassthroughMicrosoft Foundry

Capabilities

VisionMultimodalReasoningJSON / Tool useStructured OutputsCode ExecutionPrompt CachingBatch API

Benchmark peer barsfor Coding

SWE-bench ProRank 7 of 46
Claude Fable 5
80.3
Claude Opus 5
79.2
Claude Opus 4.8
69.2
Qwen3.8-Max
67.7
Claude Opus 4.7current
64.3
SWE-bench VerifiedRank 5 of 81
Claude Fable 5
96.0
Claude Opus 5
96.0
Claude Mythos Preview
93.9
Claude Opus 4.8
88.6
Claude Opus 4.7current
87.6

Benchmark scores(11)

Scores are benchmark-specific and are direction-aware: the same numeric gap can mean very different outcomes across suites. Use the leaderboard context and this model's provider route to decide whether the winning margin is meaningful for your workload.
BenchmarkScoreVersionEvaluationSource
Google-Proof Q&A94.2diamondObserved 2026-04-28—Source
SWE-bench Pro64.3SWE-bench Pro (pass@1)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
SWE-bench Verified87.6SWE-bench VerifiedObserved 2026-04-24—Source
MultiChallenge58.6MultiChallengeObserved 2026-04-26—Source
Chatbot Arena1503.0ThinkingObserved 2026-04-28—Source
ARC-AGI-275.8Listed as 'Claude Opus 4 (accuracy%)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
BrowseComp79.3BrowseComp (accuracy)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
Humanity's Last Exam54.7HLE with tools (accuracy)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
MCP-Atlas77.3MCP-Atlas (accuracy%)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
Terminal-Bench 2.069.4Terminal-Bench 2.0 (accuracy%)Observed 2026-06-07—Source
CursorBench64.8CursorBench 3.1Observed 2026-06-30
Configuration: Opus 4.7 Max
Harness: CursorBench 3.1
Evaluator: Cursor
Confidence: confirmed
Notes: Highest CursorBench 3.1 score across Cursor's published effort configurations for this base model.
Source

Migration checks

No linked migration route is available for this model yet.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 with other models

Show all 70 popular comparisonssorted by 7-day search impressions
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.12KClaude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B2KClaude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash1KClaude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5907Claude Opus 4.7 vs Composer 2.5903Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash900Claude Opus 4.7 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview747Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro596Claude Opus 4.7 vs Step 3.5 Flash450Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5361Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.5359Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Haiku 4.5314Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek R1303Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Large 2291Claude Opus 4.7 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro253Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet247Claude Opus 4.7 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5225Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3219Claude Opus 4.7 vs Ling-2.6-1T189Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 3 70B Instruct186Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok-3162Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.3-Codex138Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5118Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5-27B115Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 Pro104Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen2.5-72B96Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B95Claude Opus 4.7 vs Trinity-Large-Thinking85Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B83Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct80Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 7B Instruct75Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 3 8B Instruct74Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.174Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3-pro71Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5V-Turbo66Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash63Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.562Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek R1 052861Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5 Turbo60Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research57Claude Opus 4.7 vs StepFun Step-256Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V353Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B53Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B53Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 2 13B Chat52Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B51Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B44Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3 Flash40Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5 9B39Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct38Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Mythos Preview30Claude Opus 4.7 vs Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite26Claude Opus 4.7 vs Code Davinci 00124Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct22Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Nemotron22Claude Opus 4.7 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning19Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct17Claude Opus 4.7 vs Phi-3 Mini 4k17Claude Opus 4.7 vs Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B17Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 2 70B Chat16Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Mini14Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mixtral 8x7B12Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview10Claude Opus 4.7 vs Magistral Small 25068Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview7Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 2B Instruct7Claude Opus 4.7 vs ShieldGemma 9B5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Trinity-Large-Preview2Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct2