Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.7
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (2024) and Claude Opus 4.7 (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic. Claude 3.7 Sonnet ships a 200k-token context window, while Claude Opus 4.7 ships a 1m-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 17.3 pts. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/1M input tokens versus $5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is ~67% cheaper at $3/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.7 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 1m |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $25/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 6 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 1 shared | SWE-bench Verified leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $15/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Claude 3.7 Sonnet for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Claude Opus 4.7 holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 17.3 points.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.7 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: GCP Vertex AI
Claude Opus 4.7
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Estimated monthly gap: $4,100. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is $10/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $10/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-03-04 | 2026-04-16 |
| Context window | 200k | 1m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-11 | 2026-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $5/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $25/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.3 | 87.6 |
Continue comparing
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.1
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Composer 2.5
Popular comparisons for Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Popular comparisons for Claude Opus 4.7
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.