Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-4.6
Claude Opus 4.7 (2026) and GLM-4.6 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and Zhipu AI. Claude Opus 4.7 ships a 1m-token context window, while GLM-4.6 ships a 198k-token context window. On pricing, GLM-4.6 costs $0.39/1M input tokens versus $5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GLM-4.6 is ~1182% cheaper at $0.39/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.7 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | RAG, Long context, and Classification |
| Context window | 1m | 198k |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $1.90/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.7 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.7 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GLM-4.6 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.90/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags GLM-4.6 for RAG, Long context, and Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.7
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
GLM-4.6
$787
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $9,463. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GLM-4.6 is $23.10/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is $23.10/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.7 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-01-01 |
| Context window | 1m | 198k |
| Parameters | — | 355B (32B active) |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.39/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $1.90/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude Opus 4.7
Popular comparisons for GLM-4.6
Last reviewed: 2026-10-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.