CursorBench v3.1: CursorBench
CursorBench (v3.1) is Cursor's proprietary, IDE-native multi-file coding-agent benchmark—useful for Cursor product context but vendor-run and not independently reproducible, so it is not a neutral cross-model leaderboard. Current coverage is limited: Cursor's Composer 2.5 at 63.2 is the only recorded row, so do not use CursorBench to rank rival models. High benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick — weigh it against pricing, API availability, and release date.
Models ranked
12
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
72.9 – 31.9
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Score (higher is better).
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and shortlisting — not for universal quality ranking. Prefer benchmarks closest to your workload, then validate the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
FAQ
What does the CursorBench v3.1 benchmark measure?
Cursor's proprietary coding-agent benchmark for evaluating IDE-native multi-file coding workflows. Scores are useful for Cursor product context but are not independently reproducible from a public harness. On this page it ranks 12 tracked models where higher is better.
Is a higher CursorBench score always better?
For this benchmark, higher is better. A high score helps you shortlist, but confirm pricing, context window, and provider availability on each model page before committing — the top scorer is not always the right pick for your workload or budget.
How current is this CursorBench data?
This benchmark was last reviewed on Jun 30, 2026. Re-check the linked model pages for the freshest provider and pricing detail.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026