activeCoding
HumanEval+
Metric: Pass@1 (higher is better)Introduced: 2023
HumanEval+ extends HumanEval with an average of 764 test cases per problem (vs 9.6 in original), greatly increasing evaluation rigor for edge case coverage.
Models ranked
2
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
87.2 – 87.2
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Pass@1 (higher is better).
#Model variant and provenanceRelative to leaderScore
1
GPT-4o (05-13)
87.2Version: Not recordedHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: May 28, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
2
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
87.2Version: Not recordedHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: May 28, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Apr 15, 2026