Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (2026) and GPT-5.2 (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 ships a 1M-token context window, while GPT-5.2 ships a 256K-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, GPT-5.2 leads by a hair. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
GPT-5.2 is ~71% cheaper at $1.75/1M; pay for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2025-12-11 |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $1.75/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $14/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.6 | 80.0 |
| τ-bench | 87.5 | 75.1 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 79.6 and GPT-5.2 at 80, with GPT-5.2 ahead by 0.4 points; τ-bench has Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 87.5 and GPT-5.2 at 75.1, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 ahead by 12.4 points. The largest visible gap is 12.4 points on τ-bench, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Claude Sonnet 4.6 lists $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.2 lists $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-5.2 lower by about $1.17 per million blended tokens. Availability is 4 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5.2 when coding workflow support and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.2?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1M tokens, while GPT-5.2 supports 256K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.2 open source?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed under Proprietary. GPT-5.2 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.2?
Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.2 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.2?
Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.2 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.2?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available on OpenRouter, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI. GPT-5.2 is available on Replicate API and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.