Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (2026) and GPT-5.5 (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-5.5 ships a 1.05m-token context window. On MMLU PRO, GPT-5.5 leads by 0.8 pts. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/1M input tokens; GPT-5.5 ranges from $5 to $8/1M input tokens by tier. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GPT-5.5 is safer overall; choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $30/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 13 shared | MMLU PRO leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 holds a shared-benchmark lead on AIME 2025, ahead by 12.8 points.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $15/1M tokens.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 uniquely exposes Computer use and Parallel agents in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Sonnet 4.6 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GPT-5.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 0.8 points.
- GPT-5.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags GPT-5.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
GPT-5.5
$11,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API 0-272K input tokens
Estimated monthly gap: $5,350. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, and AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GPT-5.5 is $15/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Computer use and Parallel agents before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 adds Computer use and Parallel agents in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2026-04-23 |
| Context window | 1m | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-08 | 2025-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens |
|
| Output price | $15/1M tokens |
|
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | Yes | No |
| Parallel agents | Yes | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 87.3 | 88.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.6 | 82.6 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 89.9 | 93.6 |
| AIME 2025 | 94.0 | 81.2 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 33.2 | 41.4 |
| HumanEval | 98.0 | 94.2 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1459.0 | 1488.0 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 58.3 | 85.0 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 59.1 | 82.7 |
| MCP-Atlas | 61.3 | 75.3 |
| MMMU Pro | 75.6 | 88.3 |
| Massive Multitask Language Understanding | 89.3 | 92.4 |
| CursorBench | 49.0 | 46.6 |
Continue comparing
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5 Instant
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Composer 2.5
- GPT-5.5 vs o3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Popular comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.6
Popular comparisons for GPT-5.5
Last reviewed: 2026-10-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.