LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Code Cushman 002 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Code Cushman 002 (2021) and Gemini 3 Flash Preview (2025) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and Google DeepMind. Code Cushman 002 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Gemini 3 Flash Preview ships a 1M-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is safer overall; choose Code Cushman 002 when coding workflow support matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalCode Cushman 002Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Decision fitCodingCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1M
Cheapest output-$3/1M tokens
Provider routes0 tracked3 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Code Cushman 002 when...
  • Local decision data tags Code Cushman 002 for Coding.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash Preview when...
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Gemini 3 Flash Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Code Cushman 002

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Gemini 3 Flash Preview

$1,150

Cheapest tracked route: GCP Vertex AI

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Code Cushman 002 -> Gemini 3 Flash Preview
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Cushman 002 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview adds Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local capability data.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview -> Code Cushman 002
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Code Cushman 002; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2021-11-152025-12-17
Context window1M
Parameters
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff-2025-01

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeCode Cushman 002Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Input price-$0.5/1M tokens
Output price-$3/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityCode Cushman 002Gemini 3 Flash Preview
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoYes

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Gemini 3 Flash Preview, multimodal input: Gemini 3 Flash Preview, function calling: Gemini 3 Flash Preview, tool use: Gemini 3 Flash Preview, structured outputs: Gemini 3 Flash Preview, and code execution: Gemini 3 Flash Preview. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Code Cushman 002 has no token price sourced yet and Gemini 3 Flash Preview has $0.5/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 3. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Code Cushman 002 when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Gemini 3 Flash Preview when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.

FAQ

Is Code Cushman 002 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview open source?

Code Cushman 002 is listed under Proprietary. Gemini 3 Flash Preview is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Code Cushman 002 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Code Cushman 002 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, Code Cushman 002 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for tool use, Code Cushman 002 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Code Cushman 002 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Code Cushman 002 is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Gemini 3 Flash Preview is available on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Google AI Studio. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.