LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Codex Mini Latest vs Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B

Codex Mini Latest (2025) and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B (2026) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and Google DeepMind. Codex Mini Latest ships a 200K-token context window, while Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B ships a 8K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.

Codex Mini Latest fits 24x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B for tighter calls.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalCodex Mini LatestTogether AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
Decision fitCoding and Long contextAgents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use
Context window200K8K
Cheapest output-$0.04/1M tokens
Provider routes0 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Codex Mini Latest when...
  • Codex Mini Latest has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Local decision data tags Codex Mini Latest for Coding and Long context.
Choose Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B when...
  • Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B uniquely exposes Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B for Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Codex Mini Latest

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B

$26.00

Cheapest tracked route: Together AI

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Codex Mini Latest -> Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex Mini Latest and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B adds Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B -> Codex Mini Latest
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B and Codex Mini Latest; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Function calling, Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-05-162026-03-15
Context window200K8K
Parameters4B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeCodex Mini LatestTogether AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
Input price-$0.02/1M tokens
Output price-$0.04/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityCodex Mini LatestTogether AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B, tool use: Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B, and structured outputs: Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Codex Mini Latest has no token price sourced yet and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has $0.02/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Codex Mini Latest when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Codex Mini Latest or Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B?

Codex Mini Latest supports 200K tokens, while Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Codex Mini Latest or Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B open source?

Codex Mini Latest is listed under Proprietary. Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for function calling, Codex Mini Latest or Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B?

Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for tool use, Codex Mini Latest or Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B?

Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Codex Mini Latest or Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B?

Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Codex Mini Latest and Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B?

Codex Mini Latest is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B is available on Together AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.