Codex Mini Latest vs Magistral Small 2506
Codex Mini Latest (2025) and Magistral Small 2506 (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Codex Mini Latest ships a 200k-token context window, while Magistral Small 2506 ships a 128k-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Codex Mini Latest is coding-specialized model, while Magistral Small 2506 is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Codex Mini Latest | Magistral Small 2506 |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | reasoning-heavy apps |
| Decision fit | Coding and Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Codex Mini Latest has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Codex Mini Latest for Coding and Long context.
- Magistral Small 2506 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Magistral Small 2506 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Magistral Small 2506 for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Codex Mini Latest
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Magistral Small 2506
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Codex Mini Latest and Magistral Small 2506; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Magistral Small 2506 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Magistral Small 2506 and Codex Mini Latest; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-16 | 2025-06-10 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 24B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06 | 2025-06 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Codex Mini Latest | Magistral Small 2506 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Codex Mini Latest | Magistral Small 2506 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Codex Mini Latest vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Codex Mini Latest vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
- Codex Mini Latest vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Codex Mini Latest vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Magistral Small 2506 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- Codex Mini Latest vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Codex Mini Latest vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
- Magistral Small 2506 vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
Popular comparisons for Codex Mini Latest
Popular comparisons for Magistral Small 2506
Last reviewed: 2026-09-18. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.