LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs GPT-4o Mini (07-18)

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2025) and GPT-4o Mini (07-18) (2024) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ships a 1M-token context window, while GPT-4o Mini (07-18) ships a 128K-token context window. On Aider Polyglot, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads by 75.5 pts. On pricing, GPT-4o Mini (07-18) costs $0.15/1M input tokens versus $1.25/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

GPT-4o Mini (07-18) is ~733% cheaper at $0.15/1M; pay for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only for coding workflow support.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-03-252024-07-18
Context window1M128K
Parameters
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseUnknownProprietary
Knowledge cutoff-2023-10

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-4o Mini (07-18)
Input price$1.25/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output price$10/1M tokens$0.6/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-4o Mini (07-18)
VisionNoYes
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionYesYes

Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-4o Mini (07-18)
Aider Polyglot79.13.6

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, Aider Polyglot has Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 at 79.1 and GPT-4o Mini (07-18) at 3.6, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ahead by 75.5 points. The largest visible gap is 75.5 points on Aider Polyglot, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: GPT-4o Mini (07-18). Both models share structured outputs and code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o Mini (07-18) lists $0.15/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-4o Mini (07-18) lower by about $3.59 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose GPT-4o Mini (07-18) when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-4o Mini (07-18)?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1M tokens, while GPT-4o Mini (07-18) supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-4o Mini (07-18)?

GPT-4o Mini (07-18) is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. GPT-4o Mini (07-18) costs $0.15/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-4o Mini (07-18) open source?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is listed under Unknown. GPT-4o Mini (07-18) is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-4o Mini (07-18)?

GPT-4o Mini (07-18) has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-4o Mini (07-18)?

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-4o Mini (07-18) expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-4o Mini (07-18)?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available on OpenRouter. GPT-4o Mini (07-18) is available on OpenAI API, OpenRouter, and Replicate API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.