Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs GPT-5.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools (2026) and GPT-5.5 (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-5.5 ships a 1.05m-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
GPT-5.5 is safer overall; choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when vision-heavy evaluation matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and long-context analysis | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | RAG, Long context, and Vision | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | $30/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $12/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
- GPT-5.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-5.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- GPT-5.5 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-5.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
GPT-5.5
$11,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API 0-272K input tokens
Estimated monthly gap: $6,900. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GPT-5.5 is $18/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- GPT-5.5 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is $18/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-01-01 | 2026-04-23 |
| Context window | 1m | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2025-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/1M tokens |
|
| Output price | $12/1M tokens |
|
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: GPT-5.5, function calling: GPT-5.5, tool use: GPT-5.5, and code execution: GPT-5.5. Both models share vision, multimodal input, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools lists $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while GPT-5.5 lists tiered pricing: 0-272K input tokens is $5/1M input and $30/1M output; 272K+ input tokens is $8/1M input and $36/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools lower by about $7.50 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 1 providers versus 4, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when vision-heavy evaluation and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5.5 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 supports 1.05m tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports 1m tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-5.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools lists $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. GPT-5.5 lists tiered pricing: 0-272K input tokens is $5/1M input and $30/1M output; 272K+ input tokens is $8/1M input and $36/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-5.5 open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is listed under Proprietary. GPT-5.5 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-5.5?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-5.5 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-5.5?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-5.5 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-5.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is available on OpenRouter. GPT-5.5 is available on OpenAI API, OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, and AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.