LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Gemma 2 27B (2024) and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (2024) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and AI at Meta. Gemma 2 27B ships a 8K-token context window, while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. On HumanEval, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads by 3.7 pts. On pricing, Gemma 2 27B costs $0.08/1M input tokens versus $0.4/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Gemma 2 27B is ~400% cheaper at $0.08/1M; pay for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only for long-context analysis.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 70B Instruct
Decision fitCoding, Classification, and JSON / Tool useCoding, RAG, and Long context
Context window8K128K
Cheapest output$0.24/1M tokens$0.4/1M tokens
Provider routes2 tracked11 tracked
Shared benchmarks3 rowsHumanEval leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemma 2 27B when...
  • Gemma 2 27B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.24/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags Gemma 2 27B for Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct when...
  • Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads the largest shared benchmark signal on HumanEval by 3.7 points.
  • Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Lower estimate Gemma 2 27B

Gemma 2 27B

$124

Cheapest tracked route: Bitdeer AI

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

$420

Cheapest tracked route: Hyperbolic AI Inference

Estimated monthly gap: $296. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemma 2 27B -> Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $0.16/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct -> Gemma 2 27B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Gemma 2 27B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Gemma 2 27B is $0.16/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-06-272024-07-23
Context window8K128K
Parameters27B70B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input price$0.08/1M tokens$0.4/1M tokens
Output price$0.24/1M tokens$0.4/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 70B Instruct
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 70B Instruct
HumanEval80.484.1
Massive Multitask Language Understanding81.686.0
HellaSwag92.694.2

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, HumanEval has Gemma 2 27B at 80.4 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct at 84.1, with Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ahead by 3.7 points; Massive Multitask Language Understanding has Gemma 2 27B at 81.6 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct at 86, with Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ahead by 4.4 points; HellaSwag has Gemma 2 27B at 92.6 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct at 94.2, with Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ahead by 1.6 points. The largest visible gap is 4.4 points on Massive Multitask Language Understanding, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint is close: both models cover structured outputs. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

For cost, Gemma 2 27B lists $0.08/1M input and $0.24/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct lists $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemma 2 27B lower by about $0.27 per million blended tokens. Availability is 2 providers versus 11, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Gemma 2 27B when provider fit and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports 128K tokens, while Gemma 2 27B supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.24/1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.4/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct open source?

Gemma 2 27B is listed under Open Source. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for structured outputs, Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Both Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is available on GCP Vertex AI and Bitdeer AI. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on OctoAI API (Deprecated), Together AI, Fireworks AI, NVIDIA NIM, and Microsoft Foundry. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Gemma 2 27B over Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is ~400% cheaper at $0.08/1M; pay for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only for long-context analysis. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Gemma 2 27B; if it depends on long-context analysis, run the same evaluation with Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.