LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

GPT-4o (11-20) vs Grok 4

GPT-4o (11-20) (2024) and Grok 4 (2026) are frontier reasoning models from OpenAI and xAI. GPT-4o (11-20) ships a 128K-token context window, while Grok 4 ships a 256k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

Grok 4 is safer overall; choose GPT-4o (11-20) when coding workflow support matters.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-11-202026-03-01
Context window128K256k
Parameters1.76T (8x222B MoE)*
Architecturemixture of expertsdecoder only
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff2023-10-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGPT-4o (11-20)Grok 4
Input price-$3/1M tokens
Output price-$15/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4o (11-20)Grok 4
VisionYesNo
MultimodalNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionYesYes

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: GPT-4o (11-20), multimodal input: Grok 4, reasoning mode: Grok 4, function calling: Grok 4, tool use: Grok 4, and structured outputs: Grok 4. Both models share code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: GPT-4o (11-20) has no token price sourced yet and Grok 4 has $3/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 3. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose GPT-4o (11-20) when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Grok 4 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, GPT-4o (11-20) or Grok 4?

Grok 4 supports 256k tokens, while GPT-4o (11-20) supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is GPT-4o (11-20) or Grok 4 open source?

GPT-4o (11-20) is listed under Proprietary. Grok 4 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, GPT-4o (11-20) or Grok 4?

GPT-4o (11-20) has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

Which is better for multimodal input, GPT-4o (11-20) or Grok 4?

Grok 4 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for reasoning mode, GPT-4o (11-20) or Grok 4?

Grok 4 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run GPT-4o (11-20) and Grok 4?

GPT-4o (11-20) is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Grok 4 is available on Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, and Replicate API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.