GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.2 1B
GPT-5.5 (2026) and Llama 3.2 1B (2024) are frontier reasoning models from OpenAI and AI at Meta. GPT-5.5 ships a 1.05m-token context window, while Llama 3.2 1B ships a 128k-token context window. On HumanEval, GPT-5.5 leads by 66.1 pts. On pricing, GPT-5.5 ranges from $5 to $8/1M input tokens by tier; Llama 3.2 1B costs $0.10/1M input tokens. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GPT-5.5 fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3.2 1B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GPT-5.5 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, Long context, and Classification |
| Context window | 1.05m | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $30/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 4 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | HumanEval leader | 2 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- GPT-5.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on HumanEval, ahead by 66.1 points.
- GPT-5.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-5.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- GPT-5.5 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-5.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Llama 3.2 1B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.10/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.2 1B for Coding, Long context, and Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GPT-5.5
$11,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API 0-272K input tokens
Llama 3.2 1B
$105
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Fireworks AI
Estimated monthly gap: $11,395. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-5.5 and Llama 3.2 1B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Llama 3.2 1B is $29.90/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.2 1B and GPT-5.5; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- GPT-5.5 is $29.90/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- GPT-5.5 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2024-09-25 |
| Context window | 1.05m | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 1.23B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 3 Community |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | 2023-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GPT-5.5 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $0.10/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-5.5 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 94.2 | 28.1 |
| Massive Multitask Language Understanding | 92.4 | 54.2 |
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for GPT-5.5
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.2 1B
Last reviewed: 2026-07-09. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.