LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Grok 3 Mini vs Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

Grok 3 Mini (2025) and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from xAI and MistralAI. Grok 3 Mini ships a 131k-token context window, while Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ships a 128K-token context window. On pricing, Grok 3 Mini costs $0.3/1M input tokens versus $0.5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Grok 3 Mini is ~67% cheaper at $0.3/1M; pay for Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct only for provider fit.

Specs

Released2025-02-172025-12-01
Context window131k128K
Parameters675B
Architecture-decoder only
LicenseProprietary1
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Grok 3 MiniMistral Large 3 675B Instruct
Input price$0.3/1M tokens$0.5/1M tokens
Output price$0.5/1M tokens$1.5/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Grok 3 MiniMistral Large 3 675B Instruct
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Grok 3 Mini. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Grok 3 Mini lists $0.3/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens, while Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct lists $0.5/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Grok 3 Mini lower by about $0.44 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Grok 3 Mini when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Grok 3 Mini or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Grok 3 Mini supports 131k tokens, while Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct supports 128K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 Mini or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Grok 3 Mini is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Grok 3 Mini costs $0.3/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct costs $0.5/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Grok 3 Mini or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct open source?

Grok 3 Mini is listed under Proprietary. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is listed under 1. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for multimodal input, Grok 3 Mini or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Grok 3 Mini has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for structured outputs, Grok 3 Mini or Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Both Grok 3 Mini and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct expose structured outputs. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Grok 3 Mini and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct?

Grok 3 Mini is available on OpenRouter. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, and Mistral AI Studio. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.