Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs ShieldGemma 9B
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) and ShieldGemma 9B (2024) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and Google DeepMind. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window, while ShieldGemma 9B ships a 8k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 fits 16x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and ShieldGemma 9B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | ShieldGemma 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context | Classification |
| Context window | 128k | 8k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
- Local decision data tags ShieldGemma 9B for Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
ShieldGemma 9B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2024-07-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 8k |
| Parameters | 49B | 9B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | Gemma |
| Openness | Open weights | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | ShieldGemma 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | ShieldGemma 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama Guard 2 8B vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Llama Guard 7B vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for ShieldGemma 9B
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.