Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral NeMo (2407)
Llama 3.1 405B (2024) and Mistral NeMo (2407) (2024) are compact production models from AI at Meta and MistralAI. Llama 3.1 405B ships a 128k-token context window, while Mistral NeMo (2407) ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Llama 3.1 405B is safer overall; choose Mistral NeMo (2407) when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.1 405B | Mistral NeMo (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, Long context, and Classification | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.03/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 7 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 405B for Coding, Long context, and Classification.
- Mistral NeMo (2407) has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Mistral NeMo (2407) for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.1 405B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Mistral NeMo (2407)
$23.50
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral NeMo (2407); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral NeMo (2407) and Llama 3.1 405B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-07-18 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | 405B | 12B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Llama 3 Community | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Open weights | Open source |
| Weights | Available | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-12 | 2024-04 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.1 405B | Mistral NeMo (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.02/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.03/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.1 405B | Mistral NeMo (2407) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct (2407)
- Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Mistral NeMo Instruct (2407)
- Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen2.5-72B
- DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 3.1 405B
- Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen2.5-72B
- Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
- Llama 3 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 405B
- Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Large 2
- Llama 3 70B vs Llama 3.1 405B
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 405B
Popular comparisons for Mistral NeMo (2407)
Last reviewed: 2026-07-09. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.