BrowseComp Multi-Agent: BrowseComp — Multi-Agent
BrowseComp web-browsing benchmark measured with a multi-agent workflow. Kept separate from single-agent and GPT-5.5 Pro-compute BrowseComp rows.
Models ranked
3
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
92.2 – 86.6
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
+3.70
May 28 → Jul 9 · 1 models
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).
Notes: Sol Ultra multi-agent BrowseComp row; not directly comparable to standard BrowseComp rows.
Notes: Multi-agent BrowseComp using Dynamic Workflows; do not compare directly to GPT-5.5 Pro-compute single-agent BrowseComp.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jun 17, 2026