BrowseComp Pro ComputeactiveAgents
BrowseComp Pro Compute: BrowseComp — Pro Compute
Metric: Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2026
BrowseComp web-browsing benchmark measured with GPT-5.5 Pro extra parallel test-time compute. Not directly comparable to multi-agent BrowseComp rows.
Models ranked
1
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
90.1 – 90.1
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).
#Model variant and provenanceRelative to leaderScore
1
GPT-5.5 Pro
90.1Version: BrowseComp; GPT-5.5 Pro computeHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
Notes: One of the explicitly Pro-differentiated scores. Not directly comparable to multi-agent BrowseComp rows.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jun 17, 2026