LLM Reference
HLE Pro ComputeactiveReasoningTool use

HLE Pro Compute: Humanity's Last Exam — With Tools Pro Compute

Metric: Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2026

Humanity's Last Exam with tools measured with GPT-5.5 Pro extra parallel test-time compute. This is not the same row as standard with-tools HLE.

Models ranked

1

tracked on this benchmark

Score band

57.2 – 57.2

best → lowest tracked

Snapshot trend

need ≥2 snapshots

Leaderboard

Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).

Compare candidates
#Model variant and provenanceScore
1
GPT-5.5 Pro
Version: HLE with tools; GPT-5.5 Pro computeHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource

Notes: One of the explicitly Pro-differentiated scores in the handoff; compare carefully against standard with-tools rows.

57.2

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.

Trust this score when

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Be cautious when

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

Related benchmarks

Last reviewed: Jun 17, 2026

Resources