LLM Reference
MATHactiveMathematics

MATH: Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics

Metric: Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2021

12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC, AIME, and other high-school math competitions across 7 difficulty levels. High benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick — weigh it against pricing, API availability, and release date.

Models ranked

2

tracked on this benchmark

Score band

64.5 – 57.4

best → lowest tracked

Snapshot trend

-7.10

Apr 24 → Jul 3 · 1 models

Leaderboard

Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).

Compare candidates
#Model variant and provenanceScore
1
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Version: Not recordedHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
64.5
2
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Version: MATH EM, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base, 4-shotHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jul 3, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
57.4

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and shortlisting — not for universal quality ranking. Prefer benchmarks closest to your workload, then validate the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.

Trust this score when

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Be cautious when

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

FAQ

What does the MATH benchmark measure?

12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC, AIME, and other high-school math competitions across 7 difficulty levels. On this page it lists 2 tracked model variants where higher is better.

Is a higher Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics score always better?

For this benchmark, higher is better. A high score helps you shortlist, but confirm pricing, context window, and provider availability on each model page before committing — the top scorer is not always the right pick for your workload or budget.

How current is this Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics data?

This benchmark was last reviewed on Apr 15, 2026. The tracked score average moved -7.10 points across the last 2 snapshots.

Related benchmarks

Last reviewed: Apr 15, 2026