NIH/Multi-needleactiveLong context
NIH/Multi-needle
Metric: Retrieval Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2024
About
Multi-needle retrieval benchmark extending the 'needle in a haystack' test to require simultaneous retrieval of multiple facts embedded in long contexts.Compare model scores alongside pricing, API availability, and release date — high benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark uses a scoring system where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and model shortlisting, not for universal quality ranking.
Interpretation checklist: prefer benchmarks that are closest to your workload style, then validate against the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.
Trust when:
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- Model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Don't trust when:
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- Benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Leaderboard preview (top 5)
No leaderboard entries yet.