activeAgents

OSWorld 2.1 offline set (partial score)

Metric: Partial score (higher is better)Introduced: 2026

OSWorld 2.1 official offline set: 82 of 108 long-horizon computer-use tasks on a live Ubuntu VM with no internet access, default 1080p and a 500-action step cap. The partial score is mean per-task credit across checkpoints, reported as Pass@1 averaged over five independent attempts. Distinct from osworld, osworld-verified, and the strict pass rate on the same 2.1 offline set.

Models ranked

1

tracked on this benchmark

Score band

89.3 – 89.3

best → lowest tracked

Snapshot trend

—

need ≥2 snapshots

Leaderboard

Tracked models ranked by Partial score (higher is better).

Compare candidates
#Model variant and provenanceScore
1

Configuration: claude-fable-5-2 (max effort, Pass@1 mean of 5, 82-task official offline set)

Version: OSWorld 2.1 offline set (partial)Harness: OSWorld 2.1 official offline set (82 of 108 tasks, no internet); default 1080p / 500-step settings; Pass@1 averaged over five attempts; Opus 4.8 model grader where neededEvaluator: AnthropicObserved: Nov 9, 2026Confidence: self-reportedSource

Notes: Anthropic self-reported (lab-published). System card + launch table, retrieved 2026-11-09. Does not move /best rankings (self-reported / raon rule). System card §8.13.3 and launch table: 89.3% partial score on OSWorld 2.1 official offline set (82 of 108 tasks, no internet), max effort, Pass@1 averaged over five attempts, default 1080p / 500-step settings, Opus 4.8 as model grader where needed. Strict pass rate was 54.6% (not this row). Do NOT write onto osworld or osworld-verified — this is a 2.1 offline-set partial metric.

89.3

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.

Trust this score when

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Be cautious when

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

Related benchmarks

Last reviewed: Nov 9, 2026

Resources