OSWorld-Verified
Verified OSWorld subset for evaluating desktop computer-use agents on reproducible operating-system tasks. High benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick — weigh it against pricing, API availability, and release date.
Models ranked
8
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
85.0 – 76.7
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
-2.20
May 28 → Jun 30 · 1 models
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).
Notes: DAT-5842: Unstarred in Anthropic's shared launch table; starred rows in that table are Mythos 5 only and are intentionally not seeded for Fable 5.
Notes: Official Anthropic launch benchmark; Claude Opus 4.8 exposes computer use as a developer API feature.
Notes: DAT-5701: H Company (self-reported); medium confidence; yes - SOTA at March 2026 launch per H Company.
Notes: DAT-6106: GPT-5.5 score from Anthropic's Fable 5 comparison table; use as same-harness comparison evidence, not OpenAI self-report.
Notes: Comparable OSWorld-Verified score, but GPT-5.5 Pro does not expose a computer-use API feature in this research pass; this is an eval-harness result.
Notes: DAT-5701: H Company (self-reported); medium confidence; yes.
Notes: DAT-5701: H Company (self-reported); medium confidence; yes.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and shortlisting — not for universal quality ranking. Prefer benchmarks closest to your workload, then validate the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
FAQ
What does the OSWorld-Verified benchmark measure?
Verified OSWorld subset for evaluating desktop computer-use agents on reproducible operating-system tasks. On this page it lists 8 tracked model variants where higher is better.
Is a higher OSWorld-Verified score always better?
For this benchmark, higher is better. A high score helps you shortlist, but confirm pricing, context window, and provider availability on each model page before committing — the top scorer is not always the right pick for your workload or budget.
How current is this OSWorld-Verified data?
This benchmark was last reviewed on Jun 7, 2026. The tracked score average moved -2.20 points across the last 3 snapshots.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jun 7, 2026