LLM Reference
ScreenSpot-ProactiveAgents

ScreenSpot-Pro

Metric: Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2025

About

Harder ScreenSpot-family UI grounding benchmark for locating interface elements across visual computer-use tasks.Compare model scores alongside pricing, API availability, and release date — high benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick.

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark uses a scoring system where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and model shortlisting, not for universal quality ranking.

Interpretation checklist: prefer benchmarks that are closest to your workload style, then validate against the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.

Trust when:

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • Model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Don't trust when:

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • Benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

Current modeled score band for tracked entries is roughly 78.5 – 55.9.

Window

Sep 25 to Apr 28

last 3 snapshots

Mean delta

-1.47

score points

Coverage

1

models in latest snapshot

Leaderboard preview (top 5)

  1. 1. Holo2-235B-A22B78.5
  2. 2. Holo2-235B-A22B70.6
  3. 3. Holo2-30B-A3B66.1
  4. 4. Holo1.5-72B63.3
  5. 5. Holotron-3-Nano55.9

Resources

Website