LLM Reference
LibriSpeech WERactiveAudio

LibriSpeech WER: LibriSpeech WER (test-clean)

Metric: WER (%) (lower is better)Introduced: 2015

About

Word Error Rate on the LibriSpeech test-clean benchmark, using read English speech from audiobooks. The industry's long-standing clean-speech baseline for ASR; top models now reach sub-2% WER. Lower is better.Compare model scores alongside pricing, API availability, and release date — high benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick.

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark uses a scoring system where lower is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and model shortlisting, not for universal quality ranking.

Interpretation checklist: prefer benchmarks that are closest to your workload style, then validate against the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.

Trust when:

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • Model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Don't trust when:

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • Benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

Current modeled score band for tracked entries is roughly 1.3 – 1.3.

Window

Mar 7 to Apr 30

last 3 snapshots

Mean delta

+0.08

score points

Coverage

1

models in latest snapshot

Leaderboard preview (top 5)

  1. 1. Granite Speech 4.1 2B1.3
  2. 2. Transcribe (03-2026)1.3