Aquila 2 34B vs Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Aquila 2 34B (2023) and Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct (2025) are compact production models from Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI) and SpeakLeash. Aquila 2 34B ships a 2k-token context window, while Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct is safer overall; choose Aquila 2 34B when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Aquila 2 34B | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | General |
| Context window | 2k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Aquila 2 34B when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Aquila 2 34B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Aquila 2 34B and Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct and Aquila 2 34B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-03-01 |
| Context window | 2k | 4k |
| Parameters | 34B | 11B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Aquila 2 34B | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Aquila 2 34B | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral Small 3
- Aquila 2 7B vs Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral 7B v0.1
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Aquila 2 34B
Popular comparisons for Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-09-08. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.