Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct (2025) and Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control (2025) are compact production models from SpeakLeash and NVIDIA AI. Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct ships a 4k-token context window, while Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct is safer overall; choose Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | Classification |
| Context window | 4k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control for Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-01-01 |
| Context window | 4k | 4k |
| Parameters | 11B | 8B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Open Weights | Open Weights |
| Openness | Open weights | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | - | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral Small 3
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Llama Guard 2 8B
- Aquila 2 7B vs Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral 7B v0.1
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward
Popular comparisons for Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Llama Guard 2 8B
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Llama 3.1 Swallow 8B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Marin 8B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano VL 8B v1
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Topic Control vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.