Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Swallow 30B
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct (2025) and Swallow 30B (2025) are compact production models from SpeakLeash and Tokyo Institute of Technology. Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct ships a 4k-token context window, while Swallow 30B ships a 16k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Swallow 30B fits 4x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Swallow 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | General |
| Context window | 4k | 16k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Swallow 30B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Swallow 30B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct and Swallow 30B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Swallow 30B and Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-02-14 |
| Context window | 4k | 16k |
| Parameters | 11B | 30B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | - |
| License | Open Weights | Llama 2 Community |
| Openness | Open weights | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | - | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2023 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Swallow 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct | Swallow 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Swallow 30B
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral Small 3
- Aquila 2 7B vs Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Mistral 7B v0.1
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward
- Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
Popular comparisons for Bielik 11B v2.6 Instruct
Popular comparisons for Swallow 30B
Last reviewed: 2026-06-30. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.