Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.2
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (2024) and GPT-5.2 (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet ships a 200K-token context window, while GPT-5.2 ships a 256K-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, GPT-5.2 leads by 9.7 pts. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
GPT-5.2 is ~71% cheaper at $1.75/1M; pay for Claude 3.7 Sonnet only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Released | 2024-03-04 | 2025-12-11 |
| Context window | 200K | 256K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-11 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $1.75/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $14/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.3 | 80.0 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude 3.7 Sonnet at 70.3 and GPT-5.2 at 80, with GPT-5.2 ahead by 9.7 points. The largest visible gap is 9.7 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Claude 3.7 Sonnet lists $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.2 lists $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-5.2 lower by about $1.17 per million blended tokens. Availability is 6 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GPT-5.2 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 supports 256K tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/1M input and $14/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.2 open source?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is listed under Proprietary. GPT-5.2 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.2?
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.2 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.2?
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.2 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.2?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on Snowflake Cortex, GCP Vertex AI, Replicate API, OpenRouter, and AWS Bedrock. GPT-5.2 is available on Replicate API and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.